3 ms·
He's the one who provided the evidence. Without evidence you're just a conspiracy theorist. (Note the theory part.) And frankly he doesn't deserve the fame,
by bdamm 11y ago
He's the one who provided the evidence. Without evidence you're just a conspiracy theorist. (Note the theory part.)
And frankly he doesn't deserve the fame, and I don't particularly think he wants it either. But the data he provided (illegally, at continuing risk to himself) opened up a much-needed conversation.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoHe's the one who provided the evidence. The evidence was there for a while. Most people could not suspend their disbelief long enough to take it seriously.