3 ms·

Why bother composing a response like that without reading the article I posted?

• Someone1234 11y ago
  I read your article in full. It is mostly about the broad collection of data passively (e.g. from smartphone apps, or other leaky sources). It has two slides at the bottom hinting at phone plants, but that isn't really what the article is about and it doesn't spend a lot of time talking about them. I'd agree with the above poster, your article is mostly irrelevant if otherwise interesting. I will say a lot has been said about phone plants previously, but your article isn't about that really.
• sigmar 11y ago
  He already told you the reason, he doesn't have time to read it right now. Did you read the link you posted? Because I read it, and his skimming is 100% accurate. The article talks about Angry Birds, Facebook, google maps, and other social apps leaking personal data by transmitting it over the internet and being intercepted. Completely different from the new BBC article.