3 ms·
It's not a completely unreasonable thing to say, at most it's phrased a bit sloppily. As far as I remember, when you set up the graph there's nothing guiding th
by jsnell 11y ago
It's not a completely unreasonable thing to say, at most it's phrased a bit sloppily. As far as I remember, when you set up the graph there's nothing guiding the user to use limits for the graph that result in a proper 1:1 aspect ratio. Instead if you e.g. want a graph from -3:3 on the X axis, you probably also set up the Y axis as -3:3 too. Since the real screen isn't 1:1, this will result in the graph being squashed down.
And except for the special case of lines that are parallel with the screen edges, a stretched or squashed aspect ratio would indeed distort the angles such that you can't tell which angles are perpendicular and which ones aren't.
- xlm1717 11y agoIn the TI-83, the graph does have several shortcuts you can use to fit the graph, one of them giving you a 1:1 aspect ratio and showing perpendicular lines as actually perpendicular.