I agree with your assessment on limited CSR and think this is just a poorly written article. The logic flaw here is the categorization of CSR as somehow separa

I agree with your assessment on limited CSR and think this is just a poorly written article. The logic flaw here is the categorization of CSR as somehow separate to the scandal. The reason there is a scandal is because the company has failed in its basic responsibility to society. The article raises a very limited definition of responsibility which by application would actually imply that no wrong doing had occurred. The authority of the article contained within the line "The social responsibility of a private company..". Is actually the journalist just quoting their own words from two sentences down as a means of reinforcement. The fact that the journalist thought it appropriate to quote themselves on their own opinion piece makes this whole piece especially dubious.