4 ms·
Most of these are pretty insane and don't reflect an improvement in utility of any existing technology in any meaningful way, or if they do then they seem to de
by iLoch 11y ago
Most of these are pretty insane and don't reflect an improvement in utility of any existing technology in any meaningful way, or if they do then they seem to defy a pretty basic understanding of physics. Who made these predictions? I feel like I could come up with a much better prediction for 2115 than have been made here about 2000, but I've also got a better understanding of technology than the general population.
Since I'm criticizing the predictions made by others, I might as well throw my predictions for 2115 out there as well:
- Oil industry will still exist, but in a very limited fashion and will be highly regulated.
- Oil will mostly be replaced by advanced battery, solar, and fusion energy. Batteries will be designed to be more durable and longer lasting to cope with the pollutive nature of disposable batteries.
- Air travel will be less common due to increased counter-terrorism measures that no one asked for.
- Ground based travel and transport will be mostly automated due to its massive success in reducing accidents while at the same time increasing vehicle speed substantially (automation has allowed for better coordination between vehicles, eliminating traffic jams and slow drivers)
- Improvements in energy tech have also improved travel distances between charges, further incentivizing land based travel, which is now considered more safe than air travel.
- Greater divide in socioeconomic statuses - the middle class is almost non-existent, however living conditions for the lower class have also improved as a result of automation and increased government aid.
- Automation is everywhere. Transportation, food services, factories. Most blue collar jobs now revolve around maintaining and creating automata, while white collar jobs remain a human task, however, work in those jobs relies heavily on computers and robotic assistance.
- Drones patrol the skies performing all sorts of tasks. The night sky in the will look similar to a busy highway at night.
- We've cracked certain functions of the human brain. Gaining knowledge on a subject is now based on what your interest is, not your mental ability. Schools still exist, but their focus is on enabling children to discover their passion. Some find it earlier than others, and once you do you can opt to become an expert in that field.
- Death will be a choice for those with money - albeit you won't get to choose to keep your body. We're capable of repairing large portions of the human body with synthetic parts, however we haven't solved aging. Death will either be final, or you can choose to be synthesized into a virtual world - however those alternative endings are commercial and require a paid subscription to maintain.
- Wealthier people are generally more beautiful thanks to advancements in gene editing.
- Tension caused by war is increasing as the US continues to automate its war efforts.
I could go on for a while, but I think most of the things here aren't too outlandish. At the very least most of them would be possible if you have money. Just my two cents though. I'm interested to hear what others think.
- arrrg 11y agoThose were paintings made for cigar boxes. Of course they are not supposed to be accurate. They are jokes, visions of the future in the same way that Idiocracy is a vision of the future. (Okay, that might be a sensitive topic for some, since there actually are people who do take that movie seriously for some weird reason, including believing its basic premise to have any basis in reality.) Of course Idiocracy reflects some of the beliefs about how we think the future might be, but in the service of creating a fantastical, entertaining and funny picture the image of the future it draws is also deliberately grotesque and weird and as much about the present as it is about what we belief the future to be. I don’t think those paintings are all the different. They should not be taking as a really serious attempt to predict the future, I think.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- mistermann 11y ago> or you can choose to be synthesized into a virtual world - however those alternative endings are commercial and require a paid subscription to maintain. This one's interesting....if they could just lop off your body and keep your head alive (pump blood cleaned from a machine) and plugged into a VR machine, I could live with that I think.
- soylentcola 11y agoI just got around to reading "Blindsight" by Peter Watts. It's "hard" sci-fi and while it doesn't particularly dwell on this part too much, it imagines a future where most people at some point decide to have their bodies stored indefinitely while their consciousness is connected to a Matrix-like virtual realm called "Heaven". Basically, instead of aging and death, once you get tired of regular life, you choose to go to Heaven. Of course nobody can be sure they don't just lop off parts of your body for cost cutting measures at some point but it's irrelevant since the process is meant to be permanent. Loved ones can patch in and visit you in "Heaven" but people tend to stop caring much about the rest of the world once they're in a virtual world under their own control.