3 ms·

> This one isn't a fake account, it's a "professional" account, so she's "friends" with a lot of people that she only emails for work purposes and has never met

> This one isn't a fake account, it's a "professional" account, so she's "friends" with a lot of people that she only emails for work purposes and has never met In fairness, I don't think this is a model that Facebook can easily cater to, given that the express purpose of their site is to map relationships between groups of people what know each other in real life, and to use that information to show them ads. Not saying that I approve of that, but it'll be pretty hard for them to differentiate between a fake account trying to scam people, and this person who can't identify her Facebook friends. LinkedIn, or better still, actual email would be far more appropriate for such work related purposes and also not fall into the "real name" crap policy.

scrollaway 11y ago
> In fairness, I don't think this is a model that Facebook can easily cater to It's not a model they're asked to cater to, it's a model they break with a poorly-thought-out verification mechanism. It's NOT ABSURD to be friends with people whose face you don't know. And I know a lot of people with HUNDREDS if not thousands of friends on facebook, most whose names they certainly do not remember.
- baby 11y ago
  Seems completely absurd to me. You are supposed to know what your friends look like (aren't they called friends?)
  - mcphage 11y ago
    There's friends, and there's "Facebook friends". In reality people have thousands of different relations between people, and nuances to those relationships. Facebook has two-you're either "Friends", or "not Friends". Needless to say, this is a tremendously leaky abstraction. Thus, don't assume that because two people are Facebook friends, that their relationship in any way resemble friendship.
    - baby 11y ago
      you're playing on words. If you add someone on facebook, it's because you know them.
      - mcphage 11y ago
        > you're playing on words The words we use to describe our relationships are important, and the fact that Facebook flattens them all down to two is a significant issue. Especially when we have people who don't understand that, and seem confused why people are "Facebook friends", but not actually friends. > it's because you know them Sure, but that doesn't mean I know what they look like.

scrollaway 11y ago

> In fairness, I don't think this is a model that Facebook can easily cater to It's not a model they're asked to cater to, it's a model they break with a poorly-thought-out verification mechanism. It's NOT ABSURD to be friends with people whose face you don't know. And I know a lot of people with HUNDREDS if not thousands of friends on facebook, most whose names they certainly do not remember.

baby 11y ago
Seems completely absurd to me. You are supposed to know what your friends look like (aren't they called friends?)
- mcphage 11y ago
  There's friends, and there's "Facebook friends". In reality people have thousands of different relations between people, and nuances to those relationships. Facebook has two-you're either "Friends", or "not Friends". Needless to say, this is a tremendously leaky abstraction. Thus, don't assume that because two people are Facebook friends, that their relationship in any way resemble friendship.
  - baby 11y ago
    you're playing on words. If you add someone on facebook, it's because you know them.
    - mcphage 11y ago
      > you're playing on words The words we use to describe our relationships are important, and the fact that Facebook flattens them all down to two is a significant issue. Especially when we have people who don't understand that, and seem confused why people are "Facebook friends", but not actually friends. > it's because you know them Sure, but that doesn't mean I know what they look like.