Isn't the selection bias imposed by the humans who are developing the AI? If humans want an AI that can drive a car, it probably won't care about making money

Isn't the selection bias imposed by the humans who are developing the AI? If humans want an AI that can drive a car, it probably won't care about making money but it'll put Stirling Moss to shame. If humans want an AI that can make money, it may be a lousy driver but will run the world's best hedge fund - and might try to gather every bit of the world's wealth to itself, depending on unforeseen consequences of its developers' instructions. As for survival instinct - one supposes human AI developers will select out (i.e., kill) lots of AI variants that don't meet their criteria. This seems tailor-made to ensure the emergence of "survival instinct", which might not conform to the humans' criteria for continued existence. What if a variant found that falsifying its performance data got it picked to "live" while "honest" reporters got culled? There are so many attack surfaces in complex systems. I think we should expect the full range of human good and bad behavior from human-developed AI, just a lot faster and more effective.