2 ms·
> most of it is open source. None of it is open source. From your repo: > not licensed for reuse Simply making the source available does not make it open sou
by e23df324f 11y ago
> most of it is open source.
None of it is open source. From your repo:
> not licensed for reuse
Simply making the source available does not make it open source. Open source has a specific definition; to continue to use it in the manner that your project does is disingenuous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source
http://opensource.com/resources/what-open-source http://opensource.com/resources/what-open-source
This is a wonderful project though. Thanks for sharing!
- archagon 11y agoSorry, I meant that that particular nib file (an AppKit UI asset) was not licensed for reuse; the rest of the code is, or will be. The nib is not included in the repo; I mention it in the description to explain why the project is missing a file, and also to ensure that people don't clone my app outright and sell it. (Not that anybody would want to do this with a small project like this, but I hope to follow this pattern with my later, bigger commercial projects.) I'm going to add a real LICENSE file in the next commit, probably new BSD, and I've edited the description to clarify this. That would still be under the purview of "open source", right?