> "for humans" The earliest example of this that I could find is from a 2007 article by Jeff Atwood entitled "Sorting for Humans : Natural Sort Order". Coinci

> "for humans" The earliest example of this that I could find is from a 2007 article by Jeff Atwood entitled "Sorting for Humans : Natural Sort Order". Coincidentally, Atwood double-dipped on it a few months later with an article called "Monkeypatching for Humans" (but I think he meant "monkey" in a different way). I think in recent years, Kenneth Reitz has really taken "for humans" and run with it: "Python for Humans", "Deployment for Humans", "requests: HTTP for Humans". He's even gone so far as to (facetiously?) trademark it ("args: Argument Parsing for Humans™"). Now everything with syntactic sugar is "for humans". If you think your API represents a breakthrough in simplicity then trust me: it will do the talking for you.