What gets me is there's no need to not attribute the Popular Science article. I think it's perfectly reasonable to present treasures from the past. If this has

What gets me is there's no need to not attribute the Popular Science article. I think it's perfectly reasonable to present treasures from the past. If this has ended with "this is a condensed version" or "this is a summary", then no one would have thought the worse. And the addition of the images (which do have proper citations), does add more to the original Pop Sci article.