4 ms·
I don't think data science for health is in any way limited to wearables. I think this is the first time we've had the opportunity to do real data science at a
by entee 11y ago
I don't think data science for health is in any way limited to wearables.
I think this is the first time we've had the opportunity to do real data science at a massive scale with patient data of all sorts, including electronic medical record (EMR) data. This is because we now have:
- Widespread use of EMRs
- Decent standardized schemas for representing that data (i.e. FHIR https://www.hl7.org/fhir/ https://www.hl7.org/fhir/)
- Not-terrible medical ontologies (i.e. RxNorm for drugs, LOINC for labs, Snomed for concepts etc.)
- Reasonably accessible tools to process the massive datasets (<insert big data toolkit here>)
Many of these things emerged or matured fairly recently, so I think we're going to see a real explosion in medically relevant data science. Fitbit/wearable sensor data is only the beginning, I think things like meaningfully informing diagnoses of patients based on medical history beyond what a doc or nurse could do on their own is within reach, and the sky's the limit!
(Full disclosure I work for a health DS startup, and was an Insight Fellow, although prior to the health program existing)
- gmarx 11y agoWe're getting there. We still have huge problems on the data input side. Standards like fhir might be okay (though limited). Problem is most of the data we would love to analyze is never input as discrete data in the first place. We are far too dependent on the free text note. Also, such data that is available tends not to be available through, say, an API call, as a FHIR message...yet