> The author claims it to be royalty free. And the author delivered: With GPL3 source. > Also commercial "standards" by one party are worthless Very true, bu

> The author claims it to be royalty free. And the author delivered: With GPL3 source. > Also commercial "standards" by one party are worthless Very true, but I can't see how that applies to this project? First, the existence of this repository doesn't preclude proper standardization. Second, the reference implementation is freely licensed, not commercial.