> even Stallman would've advocated something like the MIT or BSD license for something like this Almost, Stallman (well, the FSF) advocates Apache 2: Some l

> even Stallman would've advocated something like the MIT or BSD license for something like this Almost, Stallman (well, the FSF) advocates Apache 2: Some libraries implement free standards that are competing against restricted standards, such as Ogg Vorbis (which competes against MP3 audio) and WebM (which competes against MPEG-4 video). For these projects, widespread use of the code is vital for advancing the cause of free software, and does more good than a copyleft on the project's code would do. In these special situations, we recommend the Apache License 2.0. Source: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html