4 ms·
This is an exciting development. I think the concerns about the licensing are a bit premature - honestly, this is currently a research project, not a practical
by tfinniga 11y ago
This is an exciting development.
I think the concerns about the licensing are a bit premature - honestly, this is currently a research project, not a practical replacement for existing image formats. The licensing is only one of several impediments to adoption.
- The format has no spec
- The format may change, rendering all previous images unreadable
- The format has no javascript implementation, and no way of running on old browsers.
- As far as I can tell, there hasn't been a patent search done to see if it violates other patents from other organizations. For example, this one: http://www.google.com/patents/US7982641 http://www.google.com/patents/US7982641
- No peer-reviewed paper published yet?
However that doesn't mean that we can't recognize the accomplishment - this looks like a very promising research result, and I hope the project continues! Good work Jon!
- mmastrac 11y ago> - No peer-reviewed paper published yet? While there's no paper there's a full Github repo which I'd actually say is quite impressive.
- joshvm 11y agoAs someone who regularly has to read supposedly landmark papers - with no source code provided - this is far preferable in my opinion. Computer vision is terrible for this!
- lcswi 11y agoScrew software patents!