3 ms·
The author claims it to be royalty free. Also commercial "standards" by one party are worthless
by legulere 11y ago
The author claims it to be royalty free. Also commercial "standards" by one party are worthless
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- bildung 11y ago> The author claims it to be royalty free. And the author delivered: With GPL3 source. > Also commercial "standards" by one party are worthless Very true, but I can't see how that applies to this project? First, the existence of this repository doesn't preclude proper standardization. Second, the reference implementation is freely licensed, not commercial.