3 ms·

> Wow, starting with an unusable license If you want to use it commercially without publishing source, just buy a licence from the author. Buying licences isn'

by bildung 11y ago

> Wow, starting with an unusable license If you want to use it commercially without publishing source, just buy a licence from the author. Buying licences isn't exactly uncommon. Or are OS X/iOS/Windows also unusable for you?

legulere 11y ago
The author claims it to be royalty free. Also commercial "standards" by one party are worthless
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
- bildung 11y ago
  > The author claims it to be royalty free. And the author delivered: With GPL3 source. > Also commercial "standards" by one party are worthless Very true, but I can't see how that applies to this project? First, the existence of this repository doesn't preclude proper standardization. Second, the reference implementation is freely licensed, not commercial.