2 ms·
28 USC 1391 is actually very clear. As much as i don't like the CAFC, their interpretation of it is completely and totally defensible.
by DannyBee 11y ago
28 USC 1391 is actually very clear.
As much as i don't like the CAFC, their interpretation of it is completely and totally defensible.
- WildUtah 11y agoSo is 28 USC §1400. It was not repealed and plainly sets more particular jurisdiction for patent cases. What can Congress do now to re-institute the validity of it? It's already in the USC. Pass a new clause "and we really mean it!"? CAFC judges have contempt for the canons of statutory construction when entrepreneurial judging can benefit them personally.