3 ms·
> That sounds like a huge exaggeration or a broken phone. Neither. The phone was an HTC Evo 4G: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Evo_4G https://en.wikipedia
by grandalf 11y ago
> That sounds like a huge exaggeration or a broken phone.
Neither. The phone was an HTC Evo 4G:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Evo_4G https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Evo_4G
Link describing the horrible battery life:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/17/technology/personaltech/17pogue.html?_r=0 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/17/technology/personaltech/17...
I had the phone fully charged, used it to navigate by car from SF to a place in Mountain View, checked email a few times from Mountain View, and the phone was completely dead for the ride back.
If a single person at HTC or Google had tried to use this phone for any kind of normal utilization, I think it's quite likely it would not have been launched.
If I'd purchased the phone instead of getting it as a giveaway, I would surely have been irate. As it was, I sold it to someone via CraigsList for a few hundred bucks.
This is why I predict Apple will continue to dominate. Android and the Android ecosystem still have many of these same kind of lapses and warts. My Nexus 7 is very greedy on battery and does not go into any kind of hibernation, which means that if I forget to charge it, it's dead after two days with no use at all.
- wingerlang 11y agoI see, still seems like something was way off with the specific mode. It also mentions that an update increased the battery life - although not by how much.
- grandalf 11y ago> something was way off with the specific model It seems odd that nobody would have done real world testing of the device. > an update increased the battery life Perhaps, though since it was not a google phone, it was likely at least a year until any software updates were available.