3 ms·

I use Neo4j for two projects at the moment, though I make pretty heavy use of the REST api as I'm not working on the JVM. What advantages does Stardog have over

• kendallgclark 11y ago
  It supports both property graphs and semantic graphs seamlessly, plus a bunch of other powerful features Neo4j can't touch like virtual graphs (http://docs.stardog.com/#_virtual_graphs http://docs.stardog.com/#_virtual_graphs), integrity constraints (http://docs.stardog.com/#_validating_constraints http://docs.stardog.com/#_validating_constraints), explanations (http://docs.stardog.com/#_explaining_reasoning_results http://docs.stardog.com/#_explaining_reasoning_results), versioning graphs with a Git-like model (http://docs.stardog.com/#_versioning http://docs.stardog.com/#_versioning), user-defined rules (http://docs.stardog.com/#_user_defined_rule_reasoning http://docs.stardog.com/#_user_defined_rule_reasoning). And it supports all of TinkerPop3 including Gremlin. It also has full REST support for non-JVM apps. Stardog is a better graph database, but especially when integrating heterogenous data in the graph is key to success.
  • d2xdy2 11y ago
    Interesting. I'll have to play with it this weekend. Thanks for the information.