3 ms·
And here is response from Samsung: http://global.samsungtomorrow.com/samsung-firmly-rejects-the-guardians-article-on-tv-compliance-testing/ http://global.samsun
by MikusR 11y ago
And here is response from Samsung: http://global.samsungtomorrow.com/samsung-firmly-rejects-the-guardians-article-on-tv-compliance-testing/ http://global.samsungtomorrow.com/samsung-firmly-rejects-the...
and
http://www.samsung.com/global/article/articleDetailView.do?atcl_id=23 http://www.samsung.com/global/article/articleDetailView.do?a...
"• Motion lighting – Reduces power consumption by reducing screen brightness when the picture on the screen is in motion"
- acqq 11y agoThe claim from the article is that the "motion lighting" feature (or something that Samsung attributes to it) activates just when the content is played "faster than normal" and that it effectively recognizes that the international electrotechnical commission (IEC) test is in progress. If Samsung would really document the exact conditions for the activation and they would be repeatable and independently confirmed then I'd believe it's a real feature. Somehow I don't expect that I'll read that though. But it's also true that the modern devices don't have constant power load and that it's a good thing and that regulatory bodies didn't complain for even things still in use: My old PC used 30 Watts when "powered off" (!) and my cable box does that still (!) same 30 Watts load either powered on or powered off. That's a real sucker. The TV set uses a tenth of Watt when powered off.