4 ms·

This is a really good point. One difference here is that Amazon can quietly go back on their decision if it doesn't work and they see people aren't viewing the

• newjersey 11y ago
  For example, it still isn't possible to create a YouTube channel without Google Plus.
  • reitanqild 11y ago
    Get over it already, single signon is here to stay a n d it is (now) easy to create a bunch of different "pages"-identities that are hard to trace back to your main account. Or am I wrong?
    • newjersey 11y ago
      Here is what I am referring to: >> So in the coming months, a Google Account will be all you’ll need to share content, communicate with contacts, create a YouTube channel and more, all across Google. YouTube will be one of the first products to make this change, and you can learn more on their blog. As always, your underlying Google Account won’t be searchable or followable, unlike public Google+ profiles. And for people who already created Google+ profiles but don’t plan to use Google+ itself, we’ll offer better options for managing and removing those public profiles. https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/everything-in-its-right-place.html https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2015/07/everything-in-its-ri... This was published on July 27, 2015
• EarthLaunch 11y ago
  Sort of, except Amazon loses some cred with everyone who tried to buy it from them during that time, and from press like this story where now I'll be a little hesitant to check Amazon first for Apple products in general (because who knows where else they're trying to compete). Which is a terrible impression to give.