4 ms·
Obviously this is just for fun, but the author screws up his reasoning pretty badly. For example: a) He says .0014% when he means 0.14%. b) He interprets "X%
by simon_ 17y ago
Obviously this is just for fun, but the author screws up his reasoning pretty badly. For example:
a) He says .0014% when he means 0.14%.
b) He interprets "X% of Londoners fit my criteria" as "on a given night, I have X% chance of meeting someone fitting my criteria". Apparently on a given night he meets exactly one randomly-sampled Londoner?
- simon_ 17y agoc) He hand-waves through very important parts of the calculation (how many women he gets along with, how many find him attractive). d) He doesn't give himself any credit for being able to selectively meet people close to his age and education level.