4 ms·
You could have a stable free environment that will work for a decade or a proprietary one that's designed to cause older computers to break and require expensiv
by eggie 11y ago
You could have a stable free environment that will work for a decade or a proprietary one that's designed to cause older computers to break and require expensive upgrades. For various reasons many people love the latter.
I also don't mind having excuses to upgrade my hardware but I dislike being driven forward by planned obsolescence, which is basically how every piece of Apple hardware I've ever owned has ended its life. Exploding batteries. Horrible one-way OS upgrades. I thought it'd be helpful for art and music software, but I found the opposite. I thought it'd be good for programming but had to invest absurd amounts of time in installing basic open source development software. Never again.
- omegote 11y ago+1, and yet my post got downvoted to oblivion, lol. I'm sorry I bothered all those developers at starbucks with their macbooks and their hard-to-prononunce coffees.
- oldmanjay 11y agoI'm not totally sure how exploding batteries and optional OS upgrades are driving you forward through planned obsolescence. I feel like maybe in your apparent "rage" you lost the logic thread of the point you actually wanted to make and conflated a few things into an incoherent rant.