3 ms·
a lot of the houses that are built with wood are undesirable -earthquakes, fire risk etc Many American houses are colloquially called "stick houses"[1] because
by PhantomGremlin 11y ago
a lot of the houses that are built with wood are undesirable -earthquakes, fire risk etc
Many American houses are colloquially called "stick houses"[1] because they are built from 2"x4" or 2"x6" lumber. These are often also called "wood frame"[2].
In an earthquake I'd rather take my chances in a wood frame house over one built from bricks, concrete, and rebar. After earthquakes, I've seen too many collapsed concrete buildings on TV, with people buried under tons of rubble. A wood frame house is generally too light to collapse in such a way as to pancake the occupants.
I agree with you in terms of other risks. E.g. we've had a lot of forest fires this summer, and many wood frame houses were lost. All that remained were the concrete foundations and the brick fireplaces.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stick-built_home https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stick-built_home
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood-frame_house https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood-frame_house
- marak830 11y agoI have kind of the same thinking, although during the last big one, my inlaws house is rebar and it held up amazingly well, while a few around theirs(of wood), didnt. Not exactly solid evidence though, im not sure on their build quality, where my father in law paid extra to make his house over quality(compared to the law based minimums at the time).