4 ms·
I recently turned-down a great job offer for a Bay area tech company. Their office was just too far outside my commute range. I even offered to remote-work pa
by gricardo99 11y ago
I recently turned-down a great job offer for a Bay area tech company. Their office was just too far outside my commute range. I even offered to remote-work part-time and be in the office some days a week (I had already been a 100% remote worker for 3+ years, so I had a proven track record as a remote worker). But the founder insisted everyone be on-site, daily, even though many aspects of the company were quite comfortable and capable with remote-work (they had a remote team in Europe).
This "must be colocated" mind-set is lose-lose no matter which way you cut it. I turned down a compelling/interesting job, the company lost a great-fit. If I had taken the job, burdened with an absurdly long daily commute, we both would have lost time/productivity to commuting (not to mention the broader societal costs).
Maybe it's going to take a billion-dollar startup to scale-up with a remote/distributed approach to really shift things.
- sjg007 11y agoI thought the example already was Atlassian.
- gricardo99 11y agoIf you're talking about their products, yeah that's my point. Plenty of products for remote/distributed collaboration. If you're talking about their workforce... not so much. Just checking their careers page, and every job I saw was tied to some location. Didn't see a single "Location: Anywhere" job posting.
- s73v3r 11y ago"This "must be colocated" mind-set is lose-lose no matter which way you cut it." Is it? Are they that starved for talent? You turned it down, but was it that hard for them to find another?
- gricardo99 11y agoSure, they'll find someone more local, eventually. recruiting is a cost and challenge. Self-imposing an additional barrier, one that technology melted away over a decade ago, just baffles.