Have you read through the facts of the case? Glossip did some things that indicated that he knew the victim was dead in the room. There was testimony from ot

Have you read through the facts of the case? Glossip did some things that indicated that he knew the victim was dead in the room. There was testimony from others that he was planning on leaving town immediately after being brought in for questioning. And the "hitman" had no real motive for killing the victim, but Glossip did, because of the $6000+ dollars that were missing from the motel over time. There are far more convincing anti-death-penalty cases than this one.