WTF? "No evidence" connecting him to the crime? He admitted to covering up the murder! There's no evidence that he "masterminded" the crime, but there's still

WTF? "No evidence" connecting him to the crime? He admitted to covering up the murder! There's no evidence that he "masterminded" the crime, but there's still his own admission linking him to the murder. It seems he's facing the death penalty due to ordering the murder, and that part shouldn't stick because of one person's testimony. But throwing that part out, he wouldn't have been found innocent by anyone.