I feel like there's a massive disconnect between these pieces. 1.) New law/proposition/whatever gets proposed. 2.) Article is published detailing how (1) can b

I feel like there's a massive disconnect between these pieces. 1.) New law/proposition/whatever gets proposed. 2.) Article is published detailing how (1) can be abused. 3.) Article is published detailing why we need (1). I feel like if I was trying to get a law/proposition/whatever passed, my focus would be on these articles and knee-capping them by either amending my whatever to prevent abuse, or point out why those abuses are impossible (not unlikely, im-pos-sible). Until then, all I see is "I want MY problem fixed with my bad solution, and I don't care who it hurts."