5 ms·
It accelerates faster (3.2 to 4.1). It has a lower top speed (155mph to 176mph).
by FilterSweep 11y ago
It accelerates faster (3.2 to 4.1). It has a lower top speed (155mph to 176mph).
- dsr_ 11y agoYou do 0-60 -- or more realistically, 5-65 -- at every highway on-ramp in the country. When do you go faster than 100 mph?
- Cookingboy 11y agoYou floor the car each time you get on the highway? Also if we are talking about rolling start Tesla's advantage over the Turbo S would practically melt away.
- greglindahl 11y agoSince Teslas don't make a super-annoying noise when floored, yes, it does appear that Tesla owners frequently floor it, from stoplights, stop signs, and on highway ramps. Yes, a rolling start is a big help on highway ramps. Doesn't help much at stop signs and lights.
- jedberg 11y agoUnless you live in Germany you're not really ever going to hit that top speed. You will however have ample chance to take advantage of the acceleration.
- delish 11y agoThe above poster is drawing a distinction between faster (top speed) and quicker (acceleration). Auto-journalism usually uses this language. In everyday speech, "faster" is ambiguous.
- RobAtticus 11y agoThe origina posted qualified it with 0-60, which lets you know he means acceleration. A car can't have a "faster" 60mph than another.
- TrevorJ 11y agoSure you can, just take it to a track day at local race track.
- jedberg 11y agoSure, but I start my car from a standstill many times a day. I take my car to a test track -- once every five years?
- votingprawn 11y agoDo you accelerate at 100% each time though? I dont think I ever floor my car "off the line", I think I only use maximum power to go from 60-80 on the motorway.
- jedberg 11y agoNot all the time but sometimes for fun. I would do it a lot more in an electric because the "gas" is "free" (assuming it is charged with solar). At least it is something I can legally do, as opposed to going 155mph.
- votingprawn 11y agoOddly enough accelerating like that isn't always "legal". Where I'm from it could be classed as dangerous driving, and I believe in the USA it could fall under "Exhibition of Speed". By and large it is more efficient to accelerate at full power, assuming your goal is to reach a certain top speed regardless, so if you were _really_ concerned about conserving petrol then you should be going full blast off the line. That said I expect the fuel usage such a situation to be negligible anyway, especially to someone who can afford/justify a car that does it in 4 seconds. My car isn't that fast, or particularly economical, but I know I've never thought "I'd love to accelerate at full power here to show how fast my car is, but I just can't justify the pennies it will cost me"! Outside of hyper-milers I wonder how many people do actually think about it.
- roflchoppa 11y agoRaced a Porsche Cayenne Turbo on the 101N in Palo Alto, kept up till around 140mph, at which point my transmission ran out of gearing and he kept going. I was impressed.