3 ms·
More fuel consumption, more CO2. Clear. But it's not the cheating story of VW, continued - that was about nitrogen oxide pollutants which was up to 40 times ab
by ifcologne 11y ago
More fuel consumption, more CO2. Clear.
But it's not the cheating story of VW, continued - that was about nitrogen oxide pollutants which was up to 40 times above what is allowed in the US.
From the report:
> All carmakers have been exploiting ever more flexibilities in the current official tests during 2013 and 2014, but detailed results from Spritmonitor in Germany (Figure 4) show that cars produced by Daimler, PSA and GM exhibit the largest realworld
gaps, around 40%. However, in the past two to three years all major carmakers (with the possible exception of Fiat) have become more adept at using flexibilities in the tests such that all carmakers now have an average gap of 25% or more (as against a maximum gap of only 10% in 2001).
As I understand "Spritmonitor", as a private person, you can record your fuel data (from your receipt) and your odometer to calculate the mileage you can go with your car. No details about the driving behavior that has an impact on how much CO2 is emitted.
http://www.spritmonitor.de/en/overview/50-Volkswagen/0-All_models.html http://www.spritmonitor.de/en/overview/50-Volkswagen/0-All_m...
I guess that's not the perfect, reliable source - everyone can use the portal and add his favourite car.
But for sure, I'll never reach the official 5.7 l/km with my car ...
- dingdingdang 11y ago"But for sure, I'll never reach the official 5.7 l/km with my car ..." --> are you driving a Russian tank? I drive a 10 year old not particularly efficient Vauxhall (UK) and it is doing ~17 km/l!
- Narretz 11y agoIt's not very difficult to assume he means 5.7l / 100km