3 ms·
I understand your point, but there's a glaring error in what you said. People need to get paid less than the value they produce, otherwise their employer would
by InclinedPlane 11y ago
I understand your point, but there's a glaring error in what you said. People need to get paid less than the value they produce, otherwise their employer would just be a passive participant gaining no advantage from their employment.
- itsybitsycoder 11y agoIf the employers produce no value, then we should get rid of them. If they are producing value, then the overall value produced should be greater than the sum of the value produced by their employees.
- nosuchthing 11y agoAlternatively, get rid of the overhead of value leeching wigs by contributing to worker owned coop / collectives, or similar endeavors.
- tsotha 11y agoThat's only true if you believe the you can add up the value every employee produces to get the value the company produces. But the company produces more than the sum of its parts. Or should, anyway.
- jstanley 11y agoIf the employer provides any value (which he clearly does), he would receive payment equal to the value he provides too.