3 ms·
Disclaimer: haven't had time to read the code yet. It is probably easier to do all of the massively unsafe things required to initialize in C than it is in Rus
by eximius 11y ago
Disclaimer: haven't had time to read the code yet.
It is probably easier to do all of the massively unsafe things required to initialize in C than it is in Rust. Then Rust is just used after C does its dirty things.
- Hemospectrum 11y agoThat shouldn't ever be necessary. Part of the point of Rust is that you can do unsafe low-level work, so long as you tag it with the "unsafe" keyword to enable pointer arithmetic and so forth.