3 ms·
30% would be okay with permanently seizing money as long as they "suspect" it might be connected with a crime. Put a different way, 30% of those interviewed ar
by AdmiralAsshat 11y ago
30% would be okay with permanently seizing money as long as they "suspect" it might be connected with a crime.
Put a different way, 30% of those interviewed are perfectly fine with the "Arrest the black guy driving a nice car" routine.
- Absentinsomniac 11y agoIt says: "To the best of your knowledge", not SHOULD. The should one is after that, which says: "Law enforcement should be able to permanently seize money or other property if they suspect it’s connected to criminal activity, even if no charges have been filed . . . . . 7%" So 7% are ok with that routine.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- 13thLetter 11y agoThere is no reason whatsoever to imagine such a correlation. Despite the standard narrative, it really is possible to be wrong about things for reasons besides racism!