3 ms·
"contains no supports" (was "contains to supports") Funny thing is on first reading, I didn't notice that at all and read it the way you meant. I only saw the
by Stratoscope 11y ago
"contains no supports" (was "contains to supports")
Funny thing is on first reading, I didn't notice that at all and read it the way you meant. I only saw the typo on a second reading. Interesting autocorrect the brain does.
In any case I like your Arch Fallacy! I think I will use it.
- mikeash 11y agoThanks for finding the typo. Glad you like the idea.
- TeMPOraL 11y ago> In any case I like your Arch Fallacy! I think I will use it. I'll use it too, it's great and I don't recall any term for that particular error in thinking. I've already started spreading it (the name, not the error) among friends, hoping it will catch on.