Well...don't forget these projections are basically based on assumptions. At the moment (despite the revisionist science being promoted by NOAA) there's an almo

Well...don't forget these projections are basically based on assumptions. At the moment (despite the revisionist science being promoted by NOAA) there's an almost 20 year hiatus which remains unexplained. Some highly informed scientists are convinced that climate sensitivity is substantially lower than theorized by most modelers. That said, there is a win/win solution - a widespread rollout of nuclear power generation. This should be combined with significant investment in new, safer nuclear approaches centered around molten salt reactors. What's not to like about inexpensive, pollution-free power? If done correctly, nuclear should drive electricity prices towards five cents per KWH, far below the price achievable with solar or wind for the foreseeable future.