5 ms·
If you can do without the latest of the latest in Sass I highly recommend using a libsass implementation. So much faster than the Ruby version! OT: I also like
by rakk 11y ago
If you can do without the latest of the latest in Sass I highly recommend using a libsass implementation. So much faster than the Ruby version!
OT: I also like that they've used a BEM-like approach, although I personally prefer a double underscore as separator between elements.
- tracker1 11y agoI've been using node-sass (libsass wrapper) recently, which hasn't been too bad compared to less (which is native to node/js). Seems to be working fine with bootstrap-sass, and surprisingly fast, compared to less, so I imaging the ruby sass implementation would be similarly slow by comparison.
- STRML 11y agoLibsass is night & day vs Ruby Sass. No problems using libsass with Bourbon, Bourbon thankfully stays away from the bleeding-edge features (many of which can be emulated with clever functions). In a previous project, we saw Sass compiles go from ~15s to about 400ms by moving to libsass. Completely changes the development cycle (with HMR or livereload) as you see changes immediately.