11 ms·
BMW has a system in their top-end saloons that will safely pull your car over to the side of the road without crashing if the driver is suddenly incapacitated (
by Devilboy 17y ago
BMW has a system in their top-end saloons that will safely pull your car over to the side of the road without crashing if the driver is suddenly incapacitated (e.g. a heart attack). These system are great and I hope we can overcome the social barriers eventually. Car accidents are still the #1 cause of preventable death worldwide.
EDIT: Here's another great system expected to start trials in 2011:
http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/11/road-trains-and-modular-vehicles.html http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/11/road-trains-and-modular-veh...
If you have a vehicle fitted with this system you'll be able to join 'road trains' where the front vehicle is driven by a professional driver (e.g. truck or bus driver) and the rest of the cars follow behind it - driven automatically.
- mhartl 17y agoN.B. saloon == sedan. (As with many of the Britishisms in my brain, I learned 'saloon' from The Economist.)
- sjs 17y agoAnd here I was searching Google Maps for a classy place to drink and brawl.
- slyn 17y agoWhat, you don't watch Top Gear? Though more entertaining than educational, I know the difference between my boot from my bonnet thanks to that show, as well as what a saloon, spanner, pillock and many other british-english mannerisms mean.
- nazgulnarsil 17y agohow does that work if you're not right next to the shoulder?
- vaksel 17y agomy guess is lasers, they already check to alert you when you have cars in your blind spot, so it most likely checks those before moving you over.
- Devilboy 17y agoGPS combined with various road / traffic sensors. VW has a system that can drive itself all the way to a hospital (or anywhere really) in city traffic. They're going to trial some of these systems in Germany this year. Because of more stringent liability laws in the US you won't see it in America any time soon though.
- nazgulnarsil 17y agouh...then why are the darpa challenge guys having so much trouble? surely darpa would just give the money to one of the big car manufacturers if this was a solved problem?
- Devilboy 17y agoThe DARPA challenge was five years ago! This is the result of advances made in those challenges. The Stanford guys have advanced so much that they'll take it on a rally track this year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CuVVZq9GfY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CuVVZq9GfY
- nazgulnarsil 17y agoerm...the urban challenge was 2007.
- Devilboy 17y agoThe first DARPA challenge was in 2004. In 2005 and 2007 most of the teams easily completed the challenge so the problem is definitely 'solved' now. There's no more prize money anymore. Its over! The tech is here now.
- patio11 17y agoCar accidents are still the #1 cause of preventable death worldwide. That strikes me as unlikely, given that car accidents kill something like 50,000 people a year in the US. Just inside the US, an obvious candidate for prevention -- medical mistakes -- kills far more people. (Estimated at 200k per year preventable deaths in hospitals alone.) Casting our glance worldwide, poorer nations have millions of deaths from causes that aren't even "hard problems", such as clean drinking water, food distribution (solved in Europe in about the 1700s), malaria (solved in America over half a century ago), etc, etc.
- tokenadult 17y ago(Estimated at 200k per year preventable deaths in hospitals alone.) For the United States ALONE? I don't buy it. But prove me wrong by citing an authoritative source if there is one.
- patio11 17y agoCiting an authoritative source doesn't prove you wrong any more than it proves global warming is happening ;) Be that as it may, see generally To Err Is Human by the Institute of Medicine (an arm of the National Science Foundation), which put the tally at 100k back in 1999, or Dr. Chunliu Zhan and Dr. Marlene R. Miller in a research study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in October of 2003.
- teej 17y agoThe Zhan & Miller study in 2003 supported the IOM's conclusion of ~98k deaths due to medical errors. The 200k number you quoted earlier was "found" by a study by some random website and was not published in any medical journal. Not to downplay the severity of the issue, but there is a big difference between 100k and 200k lives.
- cakesy 17y agoReally, in what way? How much less should we spend to fix this problem if there is only 100,00 deaths? I feel car deaths are much worse. Most hospital deaths affect people who are already sick, and elderly, whereas car deaths can hit anyone at anytime.