3 ms·
I think Ev is pretty clear about how this is different than Blogger. You may not buy it, but I appreciate his thinking, and find it very interesting. From https
by austenallred 11y ago
I think Ev is pretty clear about how this is different than Blogger. You may not buy it, but I appreciate his thinking, and find it very interesting. From https://medium.com/the-story/medium-is-not-a-publishing-tool-4c3c63fa41d2 https://medium.com/the-story/medium-is-not-a-publishing-tool...:
> Understanding Blogger as we did at the time — as a software tool for creating and publishing web sites — we found ourselves in the race many software makers know well: Add features, get more users. Competitor adds more features, lose users. (Marketing and others factors have some effect, depending on the market. In blogging, that was minimal.)
(skipping a few paragraphs)
> Chris Dixon had a great post a while back — Come for the tool, stay for the network — describing how, unlike Twitter, some platforms started out with tool value and transitioned into network value (which, ultimately, became a much bigger part of the equation, such is the case with Instagram). We had an inkling of this and were just getting started on the network piece of Blogger when I left 10+ years ago. It’s not that Blogger immediately suffered. Its ease-of-use continued to attract users in the tens of millions for many years. (According to Compete, blogspot.com had 63M visitors just this March.) But it was a pretty big missed opportunity for Google. (Don’t worry, they’ve done fine.)
> It will not surprise you that these observations reveal a lot about what we’re trying to do with Medium. We started out by building a great tool for writing. And it’s not even the editor itself that created the main value. It was the fact that you could easily write and share a story without the setup, overhead, or commitment level of starting a blog. It’s clear that there are many more people who occasionally have valuable perspectives to share than there are people who want to be “bloggers.” These people love writing on Medium, even if they see it as just a tool to create a nice page to point people to from Twitter.
> However, that’s not the point. Or, at least, that’s not the end. In the last few months, we’ve shifted more of our attention on the product side from creating tool value to creating network value. What does this mean? Obviously, one form of that value is distribution. And there’s no doubt that something published on Medium has a higher likelihood to find an audience than the same thing published on an untrafficked island on the web.
I think that makes sense. You can use Blogger or Wordpress or whatever to create a blog, but the difficult part is getting traction. Similarly to how Github is not only a place to host your .git repo, but also a "network" for finding/distributing those repos, Medium is not only a place to host your content, but a place to find and distribute that content.
- temuze 11y agoOh, I totally buy it. I'm just joking around :). I said in another comment: > Some companies end too early because the technology or capital wasn't there to let it get to its full potential. Blogger is a clear case for that. If it was founded 5 years later, it could have had sharing features and been Tumblr. Similarly, if Tumblr was founded now, it'd probably have a better comment system, cleaner design and collections. The real question is - is that enough to move the network effect over to Medium. I see Tumblr v. Medium as very similar to MySpace v. Facebook in that regard...
- ambicapter 11y agoI think they might've made a mistake trying to tie Medium to Twitter then. They should've tried to tie it to Facebook first and foremost, as people who want 140 characters are not gonna spend 10min on a piece of writing, while people on Facebook are always looking for something more interesting than 2nd cousin's baby pictures.