3 ms·
We're not debating the multiverse theory or alternatives to the standard model, we're literally literally talking about the stoichiometric ratios and chemistry
by akiselev 11y ago
We're not debating the multiverse theory or alternatives to the standard model, we're literally literally talking about the stoichiometric ratios and chemistry of the universe, a field of knowledge that is as fundamental to astrophysics as the concept of fusion itself.
If you can't provide a single citation to support such fundamental statements as "H20 is the second most common molecule in the universe" outside of irrelevant Wikipedia articles, they are worthless, HN moderator and community standards notwithstanding.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- comboy 11y agoNice to have somebody on my side. From what I could find so far CO seems to be the second most common molecule in the interstellar space[0], and water does not seem to take part in a nuclear fusion[1], so I think that the discussed statement may not even necessarily be true. [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_monoxide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_monoxide [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion#Nuclear_fusion_in_stars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion#Nuclear_fusion_...