Not on the technical side. But I would consider that to be almost secondary - I think the important part is demonstrating that you can do this over a span of da

Not on the technical side. But I would consider that to be almost secondary - I think the important part is demonstrating that you can do this over a span of days and have real, serious improvement; and that the outsiders (18F/GSA) work to build something with the interested organization rather than for. By comparison, I'd imagine the standard gov process is something more like: * decide something needs improvement * create spec as far as what they want (weeks) * find contractor to implement that meets all rules/reqs (weeks) * pass specs to contractor, contractor builds product (weeks) * get finished product that doesn't work very well because spec was created in a vacuum and contractor didn't discuss issues unless they were game-breaking I feel like the emphasis here is more on process improvement rather than the end result.