> Housing has physical implications and psychological cost. If we wanted optimal space filling, we'd put 10,000 bunk beds in a warehouse and tell people to deal

> Housing has physical implications and psychological cost. If we wanted optimal space filling, we'd put 10,000 bunk beds in a warehouse and tell people to deal with it. The proles can have their bunk bed warehouse while the billionaires can have estates in San Francisco. et voilà, optimal filling of space allocated by level of monetary expenduture. You know, if there were such arrangements, I'm sure that there would be people who would jump on them. I'm a little surprised Google hasn't built company dormitories, since they've got people living in vans in the parking lot rather than paying $3000 a month for a studio apartment.