of course. I was implying that regulation without a purpose: 1)That is logical, and makes sane tradeoffs. 2)Is in the publics interest instead of lobbyists.

of course. I was implying that regulation without a purpose: 1)That is logical, and makes sane tradeoffs. 2)Is in the publics interest instead of lobbyists. 3)Is divined using evidence. We need unbiased medical experts to propose a system that works which has the following charachteristics: 1) Promotes the creation and development of drugs and the advancement of medical science. 2) Allows for a tight feedback loop and quick sceintific evaluation of new drugs, possibly allowing less dangerous drugs quicker feedback cycles. 3) Lowers the cost to get to market. This is a VERY hard problem to solve as an exercise, but particularly difficult within the current political framework.