3 ms·
I have experience in this vertical. There is so much to tell about it. We market a product directly to K-12 schools and never, not once, has a school even asked
by tilsammans 11y ago
I have experience in this vertical. There is so much to tell about it. We market a product directly to K-12 schools and never, not once, has a school even asked us, let alone demanded, that student data is handled properly. There is a severe knowledge gap between educators and technologists.
Educators see marketing materials about electronic courseware and quickly see the benefits. Which are huge. There is not only adaptive learning, there is learning on the student's own time, the computer is infinitely patient and offers text, video, interactive quizzes, built-in standardised grading, you name it. It's hard to oversell the great fit between education and technology.
So what happens is that schools engage with this without asking if there are any drawbacks. This is likely to cause problems in the future. Knewton CEO Jose Ferreira is quoted saying “I’m not calling your child a bundle of data. I’m just helping her learn.” And this is 100% true. I absolutely believe he is sincere as are so many other technologists. The point is, what happens when this data is bundled, sold, hacked into, leaked and used in not-appropriate ways? We just don't know but it's almost certain that it won't all be benign. So a little apprehension is in order.
There is stronger protection for children in the EU than in the US, but it almost doesn't matter. Schools don't enforce rigorous data policies--they don't even know they have to. There are laws in place, but the law is widely ignored, no matter what jurisdiction. So right now, protection of children's data is in the hands of the technology companies. If you have good intentions, ask what data you really need. After evaluation, we now only require name + email for our program and nothing else. We stopped asking for gender and anything else that's not needed.
I think it would be helpful if a gliding scale were implemented. Does your technology just use basic info like email? You have more freedom to operate. Do you ask for gender or religion? You're subject to more scrutiny. Do you store the big stuff like social/developmental problems? You have to be HIPPAA/FERPA compliant, etc. Right now though, there are no market or regulatory forces in place to make this happen, it's sort of a wild west.
- WalterBright 11y agoIs there a statistically significant improvement in academic achievement across the schools from using this software?
- tilsammans 11y agoOur proposition is letting gifted children interact with professions and courseware they wouldn't normally encounter until late in high school. For example they can learn civil engineering, chemistry, law, but also philosophy, on a level normally given to 16-year-olds or even students. The program doesn't have the goal of raising academic achievement school-wide and we don't track that data I'm afraid.
- germinalphrase 11y agoIt is unfortunate that there isn't a more serious discussion taking place about data collection, use, protection, etc in education. Certainly, there are folks out there making suggestions about data use more generally (e.g. Sandy Pentland's 'New Deal on Data') - but it's a worry that a highly publicized negative event could create additional public resistance to technology in education right when we should be running towards the new tools/opportunities that could be created. I remain skeptical that core education will be entirely digital in the near future - but that hardly means that we can't/won't/shouldn't see significantly more data collection and use within the classroom. There are limits to how much knowledge even the best teachers can have about student competency/ability without better data tools. It has to be a part of the way forward, so let's be smart about the rollout.