3 ms·
Nothing you're saying makes any sense. > since the mass of the photon acts exactly like mass in most things except when dealing with change in velocity Right:
by drjesusphd 11y ago
Nothing you're saying makes any sense.
> since the mass of the photon acts exactly like mass in most things except when dealing with change in velocity
Right: inertia. Funny that.
The fact that photons are affected by gravitational fields, even though they're massless, was a major victory for the theory of general relativity. It wouldn't be a big deal if you could just say the photon has mass. Because it doesn't.
A photon is massless. Fullstop. To say otherwise is to use a nonstandard definition of "mass". At best, people won't know what you're talking about. At worst, they will assume you don't. You should be more specific next time.
- jeff_tyrrill 11y agoThe parent comment's explanations and terms match the explanations throughout https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass–energy_equivalence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass–energy_equivalence. Is the Wikipedia article all wrong?