4 ms·
I think this is just good for Search in general. If for a moment one stops to think of Search and not of countries\companies, this is the way it should work.
by Sven7 11y ago
I think this is just good for Search in general.
If for a moment one stops to think of Search and not of countries\companies, this is the way it should work.
Search needs to be much more decentralized than it currently is. People in different parts of the world think in different ways, express their information in different ways and access it in different ways.
For everyone on the planet to then have to wait for a few hundred people in some ivory tower in the West to decide how they access information is just not the most ideal way Search should run.
- greglindahl 11y agoWhat? Baidu is already the dominant search engine in China. This deal makes it slightly more dominant. I'm all for search competition, but this isn't going to make it happen.
- Sven7 11y ago:) Please tell me what has then in the last 10 years...
- bad_user 11y agoYou should read more on decentralized computing, because it doesn't mean what you think it means.
- lenomad 11y agoNot the OP, but I think he means that search should be decentralized with respect to regional differences, not computing. Eg, Baidu is better positioned to give more relevant results in China
- thomasz 11y agoFor a lot of search terms, Baidu is positioned way worse to give relevant results.