3 ms·
This article has me extremely confused. They keep talking about a dearth of R&D spending relative to the rest of the world and then present a graph that says we
by sailfast 11y ago
This article has me extremely confused. They keep talking about a dearth of R&D spending relative to the rest of the world and then present a graph that says we are basically keeping up and have been at about the same level compared to most countries since 1995.
Am I missing something here? Is the lack of funding rickety? That all of it is moving into the "D" rather than the "R"? Is there a distinction, or are we just "feeling" like laggards without a good key metric to represent it?