> If you're 40 with a high standard of living and mouths to feed, you've probably learned what your tolerances are, and don't need people on message boards to t

> If you're 40 with a high standard of living and mouths to feed, you've probably learned what your tolerances are, and don't need people on message boards to tell you. Of course, that's obvious, and so perhaps people should be careful about subtly reinforcing the message that startups are for 20-somethings. Overall risk tolerance is statistically associated with age. If that's not something you believe, then we're not going to see eye to eye. But in my opinion, if the OP asks if something "is a good idea" in respect to age, and there's a relevant age-correlated reason why it might not be a good idea, then I'm perfectly on-topic for bringing it up. While someone may understand their own risk tolerance, they don't necessarily understand the riskiness of the situation they are jumping into...which might be why they asked the question in the first place. So again, there's no reason I can't mention it. And your premise that my comment is so "obvious" that it shouldn't be permitted to be spoken, is simply ridiculous. It sounds like I hit your trigger phrase, and your response is likely far more about you, then about me. And I'll reinforce any message I please, thank you very much. I don't need "people on message boards" dictating what opinions I am or am not allowed to hold.