> all the person pursuing the case needs to show is that the law was violated I think you're misunderstanding the point of the proposition a little bit. It's n

> all the person pursuing the case needs to show is that the law was violated I think you're misunderstanding the point of the proposition a little bit. It's not just about recovering direct damages to neighbors (e.g. noise). It's about using incentives to crowdsource enforcement that the city doesn't have the resources to do.