4 ms·
>> Though the proof has not undergone a rigorous peer review, experts expressed no concern over whether it would survive a critical look. Such is people's conf
by daniel-levin 11y ago
>> Though the proof has not undergone a rigorous peer review, experts expressed no concern over whether it would survive a critical look.
Such is people's confidence in Terence Tao - not unfounded by any means - but the result has not been peer reviewed yet. Tim Gowers has said that they'll be conservative in their review process [0] so any errors will probably be picked up quickly.
[0] https://gowers.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/discrete-analysis-an-arxiv-overlay-journal/ https://gowers.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/discrete-analysis-an...
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- niels_olson 11y agoAny use of the word "conservative" outside a quantitative comparison should at least be disregarded and at most set off alarm bells that a deceit is underway. In no case should you draw any further conclusions about the outcome based on some presumed directionality of such a qualitative modifier. "Conservative compared to what?"
- monochromatic 11y ago... what?