2 ms·
Then you are of inestimable value to the project and its intellectual antecedents! You will perhaps find the phonetic encoding for numerals more obviously corre
by jpt4 11y ago
Then you are of inestimable value to the project and its intellectual antecedents! You will perhaps find the phonetic encoding for numerals more obviously correct - many's the time I've wanted to share some long hash identifier with a friend across the table, only to have to reiterate when they or I transpose "75555294111..." into "75552941111..." or the like. Even if nothing else from Urbit is adopted, the phonetic numerals are a demonstrably superior human readable format.
Hopefully the tractability of the number base will help bootstrap your familiarity with the ASCII alt-names. When you've poked around Urbit enough to see the ideas described in the link storm above, I would be very interested in discussing them with you (or even to discuss them in a general, non-Urbit context, both are standing offers).